PSTUPH

The Home Of Holographic Thought

RadNet or SadNet? The EPA’s Failed Radiation Detection System

NO-BID MAINTENANCE CONTRACT TO FORMER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE UNDER-SECRETARY

SYSTEM NOT READY ON 3/11

RadNet – the EPA’s front-line, radiological detection network is severely flawed and suffers from maintenance and reliability issues.

The lack of consistent data and the number of units offline (a techie term for broken) at the time they were most needed shows that the EPA was not prepared for this emergency.

Besides that fact the broken system left us all unprotected; the confusion, apprehension and fear witnessed as people try to wade through the incomplete and inaccurate data online is evidenced by an exchange on the UC Berkely website over this RadNet graph:

The graph shows that this monitoring station was one of the units actually running on  3/11 . The readings were significantly higher prior to 3/11 and drop to a much lower level  afterwards. This is an indication that the units were running in an uncalibrated condition and were adjusted only after the events at Fukushima.

Who is responsible for assuring that the system is up and running?  The EPA contracted this responsibility to a private company, Environmental Dimensions, Inc.

Environmental Dimensions, Inc (EDI) has provided maintenance for EPA’s RadNet monitoring systems under a sole source contract which can be viewed at the end of this article. The base amount of the contract is $238,000.00. This does not include materials and travel, which is billed back to the government as needed.

The contract was awarded to what is stated as a “Woman-owned 8(a) Small Disadvantaged Business“.  The disadvantaged woman in this case is EDI company president Patricia S. Bradshaw, former Deputy Under Secretary of Defense appointed by George Bush.

Excerpt From Comapny Presentation

Could it possibly be that the corporate management at EDI formed the company not out of an altruistic sense of patriotic duty but to cash in on inside information and connections? Did Mrs. Bradshaw’s former DOD employment open the door? Did the fact that she heads a woman-owned business give her company a competitive edge?

EDI’s revenues have doubled in each of the past three years and they currently have 90 employees spread across offices in Albuquerque, Denver and Oak Ridge.

The New Mexico Corporations Division website lists the corporate address as : 1901 CANDELARIA NW ALBUQUERQUE, NM.

A quick Google maps check revealed this building at that location:

Environmental Dimensions, Inc. Corporate HQ

This same company also performs radioactive waste remediation and decontamination services for a number of government-funded projects. Do they follow the same cost-cutting, profit-maximizing philosophy as it appears that their maintenance and calibration division practices?

CURRENT NO-BID CONTRACT TO MAINTAIN RADNET MONITORING STATIONS

 

Bradshaw and Rumsfeld

About these ads

April 4, 2011 - Posted by | EPA, Nuclear Power, Radiation | , ,

37 Comments »

  1. […] or SadNet? The EPA’s Failed Radiation Detection System,” PSTUPH (blog), April 4, 2011, RadNet or SadNet? The EPA’s Failed Radiation Detection System « PSTUPH – Lucas W. Hixson, “The EPA Took RadNet Down Because They Were Getting Data From […]

    Pingback by Anonymous | March 9, 2014 | Reply

  2. […] Besides that fact the broken system left us all unprotected; the confusion, apprehension and fear witnessed as people try to wade through the incomplete and inaccurate data online is evidenced by an exchange on the UC Berkely website… Read The Rest… […]

    Pingback by “At least the northern half of Japan would be uninhabitable…” | Head Space | September 1, 2013 | Reply

  3. Will you mind if I ask what is the full name of the contributor on this page?
    Is there any way to learn more information about the author
    of this post online?

    Comment by fire Damage restoration toronto | July 16, 2013 | Reply

  4. What are a few additional books that writes about this?
    Can you kindly provide a few additional book titles that can possibly
    be found in the community library? Thank you!

    Comment by toronto mold inspection | July 15, 2013 | Reply

  5. If I reproduce the material of this posting and place it on a Pdf file and share it on
    my Facebook and Twitter and credit you with
    your site Link, would that be okay?

    Comment by mold removal toronto | July 13, 2013 | Reply

  6. […] — RadNet or SadNet? The EPA’s Failed Radiation Detection System, PSTUPH (blog), April 4, 2011, aquí; — Lucas W. Hixson, The EPA Took RadNet Down Because They Were Getting Data from […]

    Pingback by Estados Unidos y el desastre de Fukushima: las muertes no consideradas | SurySur | October 21, 2012 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: